 |
| Director
: |
Alex Proyas |
| Starring
: |
Will Smith, Bridget Moynahan,
Bruce Greenwood |
|
| The plot
of I, Robot |
A
technophobic police officer (Smith) investigates
a murder in which a robot is implicated - an impossibility
according to the Laws of Robotics. But if robots
can break these laws, there's nothing to stop
them from taking over the world... or does humankind's
complete dependency on robots mean they already
have? |
| I, Robot
Movie Review |
Director Alex Proyas
proves that Garage Days wasn't an aberration and that
he does have a sense of humor with the surprisingly
solid I, Robot.
A lean, dramatic science
fiction tale, told without too much existential claptrap,
is a rarity these days, so it doesn't take substantial
effort to overlook the weak beginning of the film, the
frigid performance of the usually more genial Bridget
Moynahan or the liberties taken with the source material
by science fiction legend Isaac Asimov.
Asimov's book was really
a collection of short stories, that seemed more like
mental exercises for their author. Asimov imagined a
future wherein robots were integral to human existence
(and space exploration) and all were bound to the Three
Laws of Robotics:
A robot may not injure
a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except
where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such
protection does not conflict with the First or Second
Law.
In each tale were situations where the robots seemed
to be acting in ways contrary to those laws, but in
each, Asimov's characters deduce that circumstances
outside of the very practical laws had put the robots
in conflict.
The previews for the
film, with robots piling onto star Will Smith's car,
suggested the very opposite of Asimov's concept. This
put many into a prejudicial mood, even though some of
them had no basis for that standpoint.
A number of years ago
I was in a diner and overhead the conversation of two
waitresses. They were decrying the new Demi Moore vehicle,
The Scarlet Letter, based upon Nathaniel Hawthorne's
classic book. They were thoroughly disgusted (along
the "Who does that tramp think she is.." line)
but seemed a little vague on just how Roland Joffe's
film abused the text (which it did in several meaningful
ways). I eventually asked them if they'd ever read "The
Scarlet Letter." Neither had.
It seems the same sense
of disgust surrounds I, Robot. People have a general,
overprotective perception that Asimov's text has been
corrupted, even though most haven't read the thing since
around the time "Omni" went out of business,
and many haven't read it at all.
It turns out, in a sort
of clever fashion (though not entirely), that Proyas
and screenwriters Jeff Vintar and Akiva Goldsman (whoops,
make that Academy Award-winner Akiva Goldsman) have
actually maintained some sense of allegiance to the
Three Laws, which may be the most surprising, and laudable
aspect of the film.
There are a few characters
from the book that make it into the film as well, including
Dr. Alfred Lanning (James Cromwell), the father of robotics
and Dr. Susan Calvin (Moynahan), who in the book ages
from Lanning's protégée to the grand madam
of robotics, but here is mostly in hottie mode.
Entirely missing from
the stories is Del Spooner (Will Smith), a technophobic
detective (which is an anomaly in 2035 when robots are
everywhere) who is called to the case of the first-recorded
"murder" of a human by a robot. Dr. Lanning
ends up on the pavement several stories below his U.S.
Robotics (USR) corporate office and Det. Spooner suspects
Sonny (voice and movement by Alan Tudyk), an NS-5, the
new robot line from the company.
Sonny seems to corroborate
Spooner's suspicions as he takes off on the lam, exhibits
violent emotions, and admits to dreaming. Spooner isn't
allowed to follow-up, however, as Sonny is whisked away
by the head of USR, Lawrence Robertson (a one-note Bruce
Greenwood -- and he's never one-note). Is Robertson
trying to cover up the danger that Sonny may pose as
the company is on the verge of a massive rollout of
NS-5s?
Proyas keeps it light
and fast. Unlike his more somber Dark City or The Crow,
he's corralled his penchant for the morbid and sadistic.
But when he lets those dogs out, ever so slightly, the
film has a nifty noir edge to it. It tries to achieve
it at the outset with a number of flat rejoinders from
Spooner, but this character is more interesting doing
something. Smith is imminently watchable, as always,
as the Luddite Spooner.
Also worthy of consideration
are the visual effects supervised by John Nelson. The
creation of Sonny is one marvel, as it's one CGI character
that actually has some depth of emotion to it, which
must be the result of the gambit combining the voice
and motion of Tudyk with some top-line CGI (I say gambit
because a robot, unlike, say, Gollum, wouldn't seem
to need the integration: it does). The large-scale work
is also impressive. It's a fairly seamless, often exciting
world they've created.
Smith's performance,
Proyas on Prozac, and super special effects equals one
entertaining, respectable science fiction movie.
|
More Movie Reviews links for I, Robot |
|
|