| Meenaxi
Movie Review
Every film has a story to narrate, even if the tale
being depicted happens to be hackneyed. Also, the maker
ought to take care that the viewer deciphers the story
that is being unraveled on screen.
Sadly, M.F. Husain's MEENAXI leaves
you feeling cold. The film does claim to have a story,
but one presumes only Husain would be able to perceive
what he intends conveying. For an avid Hindi film cinegoer,
MEENAXI speaks a language that's more difficult to understand
than say Russian and Spanish.
But, yes, the only purpose MEENAXI would
serve after its release is increase the tourism in Rajasthan
to an extent. That's it!
Nawab [Raghvir Yadav], a popular novelist
of Hyderabad, is suffering from the classic case of
a writer's block. Five years have elapsed. Stories of
substance seem to have dried up.
Almost providentially, Nawab comes across
Meenaxi [Tabu] at a qawwali ceremony. The young woman
is enigmatic and individualistic. She's not quite willing
to perform the part of a passive muse.
Meenaxi assumes different personae.
She can be the mysterious perfume trader of Hyderabad,
the exotic desert bloom of Jaisalmer and the orphaned
Maria of Prague.
Inexorably, she consolidates her command
over the novelist. She dismisses his renewed attempts
at writing as insubstantial and hackneyed, plunging
him into a state of deeper despair. She is scathingly
critical about his story and is amused by one of the
characters he creates, the lovelorn and awkward Kaameshwar
[Kunnal Kapoor].
Nawab strives to start on a new page
all over again. Meenaxi comments that perhaps the book
is in vain. In any case, it is much too late. The writer
must survive and live, if he can, without her support,
inspiration and criticism.
MEENAXI is all about colors and visuals.
With noted painter M.F. Husain in the director's seat
yet again [after that fiasco called GAJA GAMINI], you
expect the director to have learned a lesson or two
about weaving magic on the silver screen. Unfortunately,
MEENAXI is akin to a beautiful Husain creation without
a soul!
It's difficult to fathom as to what
the story is in the first place. When the famous novelist
starts putting his thoughts on paper, the film takes
you to an imaginative world, but suddenly comes back
to the writer and again goes back to the imaginative
world.
In this entire exercise, the hapless
viewer gets so confused that he starts believing that
Tabu has a double role in the enterprise. There's nothing
that demarks reality and make-believe.
The biggest flaw is the way Husain has
worked on the characterizations. Why does Raghuvir Yadav
choose Tabu is left unexplained. Why does he pick on
a garage mechanic [Kunnal Kapoor] is also inexplicable.
With the story proving to be a big puzzle,
all that the viewer gets to relish are some brilliant
visuals. But Husain ought to know that luminous visuals
don't make a film. It's the story that matters in the
first place.
Film-making is a director's medium and
perhaps Husain has no clue what the cinegoer in India
looks for in a Hindi film. Yes, there're songs, but
they crop up without situations warranting them. Yes,
there's romance, but not the type that makes your heart
beat faster.
A.R. Rahman's music is plain mediocre.
The master composer is not in his element here. Santosh
Sivan's cinematography is fabulous. Dialogues are poetic,
but they tend to get philosophical at times. When spoken
in chaste Urdu, the viewer would be at a loss to comprehend
yet again!
Given the kind of roles, Tabu, Raghuvir
Yadav and Kunnal Kapoor try hard to get going. Tabu
has never looked so pretty ever. Draped in ethnic outfits,
her looks stand out more than her performance. However,
Tabu's Hyderabadi dialect is all trumps!
Raghuvir Yadav gives a decent account
of himself, although his talent remains untapped in
an enterprise like this. Debutante Kunnal Kapoor looks
confident. Despite performing with seasoned performers,
this newcomer holds his innings well.
Nadira Babbar is lovable. Sharat Saxena
and Bharat Kapoor don't really get much scope.
On the whole, MEENAXI is a damp squib.
At the box-office, its rejection by the classes as well
as the masses is inevitable. |